↓ Skip to main content

Instanton counting on blowup. I. 4-dimensional pure gauge theory

Overview of attention for article published in Inventiones mathematicae, June 2005
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

q&a
1 Q&A thread

Citations

dimensions_citation
214 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
34 Mendeley
Title
Instanton counting on blowup. I. 4-dimensional pure gauge theory
Published in
Inventiones mathematicae, June 2005
DOI 10.1007/s00222-005-0444-1
Authors

Hiraku Nakajima, Kota Yoshioka

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 34 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Japan 1 3%
Brazil 1 3%
Unknown 32 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 26%
Researcher 8 24%
Student > Master 5 15%
Professor > Associate Professor 4 12%
Student > Bachelor 2 6%
Other 3 9%
Unknown 3 9%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Physics and Astronomy 15 44%
Mathematics 15 44%
Philosophy 1 3%
Unknown 3 9%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 July 2015.
All research outputs
#14,817,495
of 25,707,225 outputs
Outputs from Inventiones mathematicae
#776
of 1,134 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#59,250
of 68,041 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Inventiones mathematicae
#2
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,707,225 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,134 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.5. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 68,041 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.