↓ Skip to main content

Crystallin proteins and amyloid fibrils

Overview of attention for article published in Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences, September 2008
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (71st percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (55th percentile)

Mentioned by

patent
1 patent
wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
209 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
157 Mendeley
citeulike
3 CiteULike
Title
Crystallin proteins and amyloid fibrils
Published in
Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences, September 2008
DOI 10.1007/s00018-008-8327-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

H. Ecroyd, John A. Carver

Abstract

Improper protein folding (misfolding) can lead to the formation of disordered (amorphous) or ordered (amyloid fibril) aggregates. The major lens protein, alpha-crystallin, is a member of the small heat-shock protein (sHsp) family of intracellular molecular chaperone proteins that prevent protein aggregation. Whilst the chaperone activity of sHsps against amorphously aggregating proteins has been well studied, its action against fibril-forming proteins has received less attention despite the presence of sHsps in deposits found in fibril-associated diseases (e.g. Alzheimer's and Parkinson's). In this review, the literature on the interaction of alphaB-crystallin and other sHsps with fibril-forming proteins is summarized. In particular, the ability of sHsps to prevent fibril formation, their mechanisms of action and the possible in vivo consequences of such associations are discussed. Finally, the fibril-forming propensity of the crystallin proteins and its implications for cataract formation are described along with the potential use of fibrillar crystallin proteins as bionanomaterials.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 157 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Italy 2 1%
Poland 2 1%
United States 2 1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 147 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 55 35%
Researcher 30 19%
Student > Master 19 12%
Student > Bachelor 10 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 4%
Other 17 11%
Unknown 20 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 58 37%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 23 15%
Chemistry 17 11%
Medicine and Dentistry 10 6%
Materials Science 5 3%
Other 18 11%
Unknown 26 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 March 2021.
All research outputs
#4,965,094
of 23,794,258 outputs
Outputs from Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences
#928
of 4,151 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#17,643
of 89,376 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences
#11
of 43 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,794,258 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 76th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,151 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 89,376 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 43 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its contemporaries.