You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
How are topical opioids used to manage painful cutaneous lesions in palliative care? A critical review
|
---|---|
Published in |
Pain (03043959), June 2013
|
DOI | 10.1016/j.pain.2013.06.016 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Tanya Graham, Patricia Grocott, Sebastian Probst, Steven Wanklyn, Jacqueline Dawson, Georgina Gethin |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 60 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 1 | 2% |
Unknown | 59 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Other | 11 | 18% |
Student > Master | 8 | 13% |
Student > Postgraduate | 6 | 10% |
Student > Bachelor | 5 | 8% |
Researcher | 5 | 8% |
Other | 16 | 27% |
Unknown | 9 | 15% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 26 | 43% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 12 | 20% |
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 3 | 5% |
Neuroscience | 3 | 5% |
Business, Management and Accounting | 2 | 3% |
Other | 4 | 7% |
Unknown | 10 | 17% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 July 2015.
All research outputs
#20,726,842
of 25,461,852 outputs
Outputs from Pain (03043959)
#5,974
of 6,477 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#160,382
of 210,103 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Pain (03043959)
#127
of 131 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,461,852 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,477 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 16.1. This one is in the 3rd percentile – i.e., 3% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 210,103 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 131 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.