↓ Skip to main content

Efficacy and safety of Velmanase alfa in the treatment of patients with alpha‐mannosidosis: results from the core and extension phase analysis of a phase III multicentre, double‐blind, randomised…

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Inherited Metabolic Disease, May 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#35 of 1,988)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (89th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (97th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
twitter
5 X users
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
38 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
51 Mendeley
Title
Efficacy and safety of Velmanase alfa in the treatment of patients with alpha‐mannosidosis: results from the core and extension phase analysis of a phase III multicentre, double‐blind, randomised, placebo‐controlled trial
Published in
Journal of Inherited Metabolic Disease, May 2018
DOI 10.1007/s10545-018-0185-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

Line Borgwardt, Nathalie Guffon, Yasmina Amraoui, Christine I. Dali, Linda De Meirleir, Mercedes Gil‐Campos, Bénédicte Heron, Silvia Geraci, Diego Ardigò, Federica Cattaneo, Jens Fogh, J. M. Hannerieke Van den Hout, Michael Beck, Simon A. Jones, Anna Tylki‐Szymanska, Ulla Haugsted, Allan M. Lund

Abstract

This phase III, double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled trial (and extension phase) was designed to assess the efficacy and safety of velmanase alfa (VA) in alpha-mannosidosis (AM) patients. Twenty-five patients were randomised to weekly 1 mg/kg VA or placebo for 52 weeks. At study conclusion, placebo patients switched to VA; 23 patients continued receiving VA in compassionate-use/follow-on studies and were evaluated in the extension phase [last observation (LO)]. Co-primary endpoints were changes in serum oligosaccharide (S-oligo) and in the 3-min stair-climb test (3MSCT). Mean relative change in S-oligo in the VA arm was -77.6% [95% confidence interval (CI) -81.6 to -72.8] at week 52 and -62.9% (95% CI -85.8 to -40.0) at LO; mean relative change in the placebo arm was -24.1% (95% CI -40.3 to -3.6) at week 52 and -55.7% (95% CI -76.4 to -34.9) at LO after switch to active treatment. Mean relative change in 3MSCT at week 52 was -1.1% (95% CI -9.0 to 7.6) and - % (95% CI -13.4 to 6.5) for VA and placebo, respectively. At LO, the mean relative change was 3.9% (95% CI -5.5 to 13.2) in the VA arm and 9.0% (95% CI -10.3 to 28.3) in placebo patients after switch to active treatment. Similar improvement pattern was observed in secondary parameters. A post hoc analysis investigated whether some factors at baseline could account for treatment outcome; none of those factors were predictive of the response to VA, besides age. These findings support the utility of VA for the treatment of AM, with more evident benefit over time and when treatment is started in the paediatric age.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 51 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 51 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 6 12%
Researcher 4 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 6%
Other 3 6%
Other 8 16%
Unknown 23 45%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 13 25%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 8%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 4%
Psychology 2 4%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 2%
Other 5 10%
Unknown 24 47%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 22. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 December 2023.
All research outputs
#1,653,012
of 25,022,483 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Inherited Metabolic Disease
#35
of 1,988 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#34,816
of 337,320 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Inherited Metabolic Disease
#2
of 34 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,022,483 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,988 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 337,320 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 34 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.