↓ Skip to main content

Ion recombination correction factor in scanned light-ion beams for absolute dose measurement using plane-parallel ionisation chambers

Overview of attention for article published in Physics in Medicine & Biology, June 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (51st percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (54th percentile)

Mentioned by

patent
1 patent

Readers on

mendeley
34 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Ion recombination correction factor in scanned light-ion beams for absolute dose measurement using plane-parallel ionisation chambers
Published in
Physics in Medicine & Biology, June 2017
DOI 10.1088/1361-6560/aa730f
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Based on international reference dosimetry protocols for light-ion beams, a correction factor (<i>k<sub>s</sub></i>) has to be applied to the response of a plane-parallel ionisation chamber, to account for recombination of negative and positive charges in its air cavity before these charges can be collected on the electrodes. In this work, <i>k<sub>s</sub></i> for IBA PPC40 Roos-type chambers is investigated in four scanned light-ion beams (proton, helium, carbon and oxygen). To take into account the high dose-rates used with scanned beams and LET-values, experimental results are compared to a model combining two theories. One theory, developed by Jaffé, describes the variation of <i>k<sub>s</sub></i> with the ionization density within the ion track (initial recombination) and the other theory, developed by Boag, describes the variation of <i>k<sub>s</sub></i> with the dose rate (volume recombination). Excellent agreement is found between experimental and theoretical <i>k<sub>s</sub></i>-values. All results confirm that <i>k<sub>s</sub></i> cannot be neglected. The solution to minimise <i>k<sub>s</sub></i> is to use the ionisation chamber at high voltage. However, one must be aware that charge multiplication may complicate the interpretation of the measurement. For the chamber tested, it was found that a voltage of 300 V can be used without further complication. As the initial recombination has a logarithmic variation as a function of 1/V, the two-voltage method is not applicable to these scanned beams.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 34 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 34 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 21%
Researcher 7 21%
Other 3 9%
Student > Master 3 9%
Professor > Associate Professor 1 3%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 13 38%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Physics and Astronomy 15 44%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 6%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 3%
Social Sciences 1 3%
Unknown 15 44%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 December 2021.
All research outputs
#9,392,331
of 27,387,710 outputs
Outputs from Physics in Medicine & Biology
#1,835
of 6,285 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#131,353
of 338,903 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Physics in Medicine & Biology
#18
of 57 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 27,387,710 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,285 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.9. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 338,903 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 57 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.