| Title |
Intrinsic GUS-like activities in seed plants
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Plant Cell Reports, June 1990
|
| DOI | 10.1007/bf00232123 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Ching-yeh Hu, Paula P. Chee, Robert H. Chesney, James H. Zhou, Paul D. Miller, W. Timothy O'Brien |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 31 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Australia | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 30 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Doctoral Student | 5 | 16% |
| Researcher | 5 | 16% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 16% |
| Student > Master | 4 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 3 | 10% |
| Other | 3 | 10% |
| Unknown | 6 | 19% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 16 | 52% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 5 | 16% |
| Chemistry | 1 | 3% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 8 | 26% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 July 2019.
All research outputs
#6,017,379
of 24,044,816 outputs
Outputs from Plant Cell Reports
#554
of 2,272 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,338
of 16,763 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Plant Cell Reports
#3
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,044,816 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,272 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 16,763 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 4 of them.