| Title |
Mango nurseries as sources of Fusarium mexicanum, cause of mango malformation disease in central western Mexico
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Phytoparasitica, May 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s12600-015-0471-4 |
| Authors |
Alejandro Soto-Plancarte, Ricardo Santillán-Mendoza, Sylvia P. Fernández-Pavía, Randy C. Ploetz, Stanley Freeman, Rubén Ortega-Arreola, Pedro Osuna-Ávila, José J. Velázquez-Monreal, Gerardo Rodríguez-Alvarado |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 18 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 18 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 4 | 22% |
| Student > Master | 3 | 17% |
| Student > Bachelor | 2 | 11% |
| Librarian | 2 | 11% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 11% |
| Other | 3 | 17% |
| Unknown | 2 | 11% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 9 | 50% |
| Engineering | 3 | 17% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 1 | 6% |
| Environmental Science | 1 | 6% |
| Psychology | 1 | 6% |
| Other | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 2 | 11% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 June 2015.
All research outputs
#20,283,046
of 22,817,213 outputs
Outputs from Phytoparasitica
#201
of 225 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#222,570
of 264,475 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Phytoparasitica
#2
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,817,213 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 225 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.5. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 264,475 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.