↓ Skip to main content

Ask not what nature can do for you: A critique of ecosystem services as a communication strategy

Overview of attention for article published in Biological Conservation, August 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (85th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
1 blog
policy
1 policy source
twitter
85 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
54 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
297 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Ask not what nature can do for you: A critique of ecosystem services as a communication strategy
Published in
Biological Conservation, August 2018
DOI 10.1016/j.biocon.2018.05.017
Authors

S.A. Bekessy, M.C. Runge, A.M. Kusmanoff, D.A. Keith, B.A. Wintle

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 85 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 297 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 297 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 54 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 52 18%
Student > Master 45 15%
Student > Bachelor 22 7%
Other 16 5%
Other 34 11%
Unknown 74 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 78 26%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 78 26%
Social Sciences 13 4%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 8 3%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 7 2%
Other 30 10%
Unknown 83 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 70. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 July 2023.
All research outputs
#607,005
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from Biological Conservation
#486
of 6,613 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#13,006
of 341,886 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biological Conservation
#12
of 83 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,613 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 24.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 341,886 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 83 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.