| Title |
Single-cell RNA-seq transcriptome analysis of linear and circular RNAs in mouse preimplantation embryos
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Genome Biology, July 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13059-015-0706-1 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Xiaoying Fan, Xiannian Zhang, Xinglong Wu, Hongshan Guo, Yuqiong Hu, Fuchou Tang, Yanyi Huang |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 16 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 4 | 25% |
| France | 3 | 19% |
| Austria | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 8 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 10 | 63% |
| Scientists | 5 | 31% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 6% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 447 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | <1% |
| Japan | 2 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | <1% |
| Sweden | 1 | <1% |
| Iran, Islamic Republic of | 1 | <1% |
| Italy | 1 | <1% |
| Denmark | 1 | <1% |
| Austria | 1 | <1% |
| Mexico | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 433 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 120 | 27% |
| Researcher | 78 | 17% |
| Student > Master | 53 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 33 | 7% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 19 | 4% |
| Other | 56 | 13% |
| Unknown | 88 | 20% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 139 | 31% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 130 | 29% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 21 | 5% |
| Neuroscience | 16 | 4% |
| Computer Science | 10 | 2% |
| Other | 33 | 7% |
| Unknown | 98 | 22% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 27. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 September 2022.
All research outputs
#1,477,211
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Genome Biology
#1,178
of 4,513 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#18,204
of 278,580 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Genome Biology
#21
of 60 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,513 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 27.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 278,580 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 60 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.