Title |
Nanoemulsions in Translational Research—Opportunities and Challenges in Targeted Cancer Therapy
|
---|---|
Published in |
AAPS PharmSciTech, February 2014
|
DOI | 10.1208/s12249-014-0088-9 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Srinivas Ganta, Meghna Talekar, Amit Singh, Timothy P. Coleman, Mansoor M. Amiji |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 256 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Austria | 1 | <1% |
Brazil | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 254 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 50 | 20% |
Student > Master | 40 | 16% |
Student > Bachelor | 26 | 10% |
Researcher | 26 | 10% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 11 | 4% |
Other | 27 | 11% |
Unknown | 76 | 30% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 60 | 23% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 21 | 8% |
Chemistry | 21 | 8% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 17 | 7% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 16 | 6% |
Other | 33 | 13% |
Unknown | 88 | 34% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 August 2020.
All research outputs
#4,363,630
of 25,611,630 outputs
Outputs from AAPS PharmSciTech
#158
of 1,594 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#49,074
of 325,247 outputs
Outputs of similar age from AAPS PharmSciTech
#5
of 25 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,611,630 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,594 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 325,247 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 25 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.