Title |
Characterization and Evaluation of 5-Fluorouracil-Loaded Solid Lipid Nanoparticles Prepared via a Temperature-Modulated Solidification Technique
|
---|---|
Published in |
AAPS PharmSciTech, July 2014
|
DOI | 10.1208/s12249-014-0168-x |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Meghavi N. Patel, Sushant Lakkadwala, Mohamed S. Majrad, Elisha R. Injeti, Steven M. Gollmer, Zahoor A. Shah, Sai Hanuman Sagar Boddu, Jerry Nesamony |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 89 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
India | 1 | 1% |
Unknown | 88 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 14 | 16% |
Student > Bachelor | 11 | 12% |
Student > Master | 10 | 11% |
Researcher | 7 | 8% |
Professor > Associate Professor | 7 | 8% |
Other | 17 | 19% |
Unknown | 23 | 26% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 25 | 28% |
Chemistry | 8 | 9% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 7 | 8% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 6 | 7% |
Engineering | 4 | 4% |
Other | 12 | 13% |
Unknown | 27 | 30% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 July 2015.
All research outputs
#5,744,947
of 22,817,213 outputs
Outputs from AAPS PharmSciTech
#323
of 1,468 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#53,677
of 228,898 outputs
Outputs of similar age from AAPS PharmSciTech
#13
of 20 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,817,213 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,468 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 228,898 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 20 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.