↓ Skip to main content

Prion disease: experimental models and reality

Overview of attention for article published in Acta Neuropathologica, January 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
56 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
152 Mendeley
Title
Prion disease: experimental models and reality
Published in
Acta Neuropathologica, January 2017
DOI 10.1007/s00401-017-1670-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sebastian Brandner, Zane Jaunmuktane

Abstract

The understanding of the pathogenesis and mechanisms of diseases requires a multidisciplinary approach, involving clinical observation, correlation to pathological processes, and modelling of disease mechanisms. It is an inherent challenge, and arguably impossible to generate model systems that can faithfully recapitulate all aspects of human disease. It is, therefore, important to be aware of the potentials and also the limitations of specific model systems. Model systems are usually designed to recapitulate only specific aspects of the disease, such as a pathological phenotype, a pathomechanism, or to test a hypothesis. Here, we evaluate and discuss model systems that were generated to understand clinical, pathological, genetic, biochemical, and epidemiological aspects of prion diseases. Whilst clinical research and studies on human tissue are an essential component of prion research, much of the understanding of the mechanisms governing transmission, replication, and toxicity comes from in vitro and in vivo studies. As with other neurodegenerative diseases caused by protein misfolding, the pathogenesis of prion disease is complex, full of conundra and contradictions. We will give here a historical overview of the use of models of prion disease, how they have evolved alongside the scientific questions, and how advancements in technologies have pushed the boundaries of our understanding of prion biology.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 152 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Switzerland 1 <1%
Unknown 151 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 29 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 26 17%
Student > Master 22 14%
Researcher 16 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 9 6%
Other 17 11%
Unknown 33 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 40 26%
Neuroscience 21 14%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 19 13%
Medicine and Dentistry 14 9%
Immunology and Microbiology 7 5%
Other 16 11%
Unknown 35 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 October 2023.
All research outputs
#14,411,359
of 24,585,562 outputs
Outputs from Acta Neuropathologica
#2,137
of 2,498 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#217,949
of 431,147 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Acta Neuropathologica
#24
of 32 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,585,562 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,498 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.7. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 431,147 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 32 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.