↓ Skip to main content

Screening, Isolation and Identification of Probiotic Producing Lactobacillus acidophilus Strains EMBS081

Overview of attention for article published in Interdisciplinary Sciences: Computational Life Sciences, July 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
14 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
28 Mendeley
Title
Screening, Isolation and Identification of Probiotic Producing Lactobacillus acidophilus Strains EMBS081 & EMBS082 by 16S rRNA Gene Sequencing
Published in
Interdisciplinary Sciences: Computational Life Sciences, July 2015
DOI 10.1007/s12539-015-0002-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Harshpreet Chandok, Pratik Shah, Uday Raj Akare, Maliram Hindala, Sneha Singh Bhadoriya, G. V. Ravi, Varsha Sharma, Srinivas Bandaru, Pragya Rathore, Anuraj Nayarisseri

Abstract

16S rDNA sequencing which has gained wide popularity amongst microbiologists for the molecular characterization and identification of newly discovered isolates provides accurate identification of isolates down to the level of sub-species (strain). Its most important advantage over the traditional biochemical characterization methods is that it can provide an accurate identification of strains with atypical phenotypic characters as well. The following work is an application of 16S rRNA gene sequencing approach to identify a novel species of Probiotic Lactobacillus acidophilus. The sample was collected from pond water samples of rural and urban areas of Krishna district, Vijayawada, Andhra Pradesh, India. Subsequently, the sample was serially diluted and the aliquots were incubated for a suitable time period following which the suspected colony was subjected to 16S rDNA sequencing. The sequence aligned against other species was concluded to be a novel, Probiotic L. acidophilus bacteria, further which were named L. acidophilus strain EMBS081 & EMBS082. After the sequence characterization, the isolate was deposited in GenBank Database, maintained by the National Centre for Biotechnology Information NCBI. The sequence can also be retrieve from EMBL and DDBJ repositories with accession numbers JX255677 and KC150145.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 28 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 28 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 25%
Student > Master 4 14%
Other 2 7%
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer 2 7%
Unspecified 2 7%
Other 5 18%
Unknown 6 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 10 36%
Unspecified 3 11%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 11%
Immunology and Microbiology 2 7%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 4%
Other 1 4%
Unknown 8 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 July 2015.
All research outputs
#18,418,919
of 22,817,213 outputs
Outputs from Interdisciplinary Sciences: Computational Life Sciences
#165
of 294 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#189,670
of 263,986 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Interdisciplinary Sciences: Computational Life Sciences
#10
of 23 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,817,213 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 294 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.9. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 263,986 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 23 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.