| Title |
Scaffolding practices that enhance mathematics learning
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, June 2006
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10857-006-9005-9 |
| Authors |
Julia Anghileri |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 581 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| South Africa | 3 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | <1% |
| Turkey | 1 | <1% |
| Bulgaria | 1 | <1% |
| Portugal | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 573 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 78 | 13% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 61 | 10% |
| Lecturer | 55 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 38 | 7% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 31 | 5% |
| Other | 83 | 14% |
| Unknown | 235 | 40% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Social Sciences | 130 | 22% |
| Mathematics | 123 | 21% |
| Arts and Humanities | 20 | 3% |
| Psychology | 17 | 3% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 12 | 2% |
| Other | 45 | 8% |
| Unknown | 234 | 40% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 35. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 October 2021.
All research outputs
#1,156,112
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education
#5
of 340 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,774
of 92,261 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 340 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 92,261 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them