| Title |
Transformation ofBrassica juncea byAgrobacterium tumefaciens harbouring plasmid pTiT37 and its ‘rooty’ mutant pTiT37.14a/a
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Genetics, August 1986
|
| DOI | 10.1007/bf02923534 |
| Authors |
Helena Mathews, P S Rao, C R Bhatia |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 3 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 3 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 2 | 67% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 33% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 December 1987.
All research outputs
#7,568,674
of 23,083,773 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Genetics
#93
of 678 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,953
of 10,850 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Genetics
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,083,773 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 678 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 10,850 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them