| Title |
Genomic footprint of evolution of eusociality in bees: floral food use and CYPome “blooms”
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Insectes Sociaux, May 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00040-018-0631-x |
| Authors |
Reed M. Johnson, Brock A. Harpur, Kathleen A. Dogantzis, Amro Zayed, May R. Berenbaum |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 2 | 33% |
| United States | 1 | 17% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 17% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 17% |
| Unknown | 1 | 17% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 4 | 67% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 17% |
| Members of the public | 1 | 17% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 56 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 56 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 10 | 18% |
| Student > Master | 9 | 16% |
| Student > Bachelor | 6 | 11% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 4 | 7% |
| Researcher | 4 | 7% |
| Other | 10 | 18% |
| Unknown | 13 | 23% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 20 | 36% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 8 | 14% |
| Environmental Science | 3 | 5% |
| Unspecified | 2 | 4% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 4 | 7% |
| Unknown | 17 | 30% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 July 2018.
All research outputs
#7,766,797
of 25,083,571 outputs
Outputs from Insectes Sociaux
#310
of 1,023 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#124,653
of 337,750 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Insectes Sociaux
#10
of 24 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,083,571 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 68th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,023 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 337,750 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 24 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its contemporaries.