You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Prospective Analysis of Adoptive TIL Therapy in Patients with Metastatic Melanoma: Response, Impact of Anti-CTLA4, and Biomarkers to Predict Clinical Outcome
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Clinical Cancer Research, September 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-17-3649 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Marie-Andrée Forget, Cara Haymaker, Kenneth R. Hess, Yuzhong Jeff Meng, Caitlin Creasy, Tatiana Karpinets, Orenthial J. Fulbright, Jason Roszik, Scott E. Woodman, Young Uk Kim, Donastas Sakellariou-Thompson, Ankit Bhatta, Arely Wahl, Esteban Flores, Shawne T. Thorsen, René J. Tavera, Renjith Ramachandran, Audrey M. Gonzalez, Christopher L. Toth, Seth Wardell, Rahmatu Mansaray, Vruti Patel, Destiny Joy Carpio, Carol Vaughn, Chantell M. Farinas, Portia G. Velasquez, Wen-Jen Hwu, Sapna P. Patel, Michael A. Davies, Adi Diab, Isabella C. Glitza, Hussein Tawbi, Michael K. Wong, Suzanne Cain, Merrick I. Ross, Jeffrey E. Lee, Jeffrey E. Gershenwald, Anthony Lucci, Richard Royal, Janice N. Cormier, Jennifer A. Wargo, Laszlo G. Radvanyi, Carlos A. Torres-Cabala, Rameen Beroukhim, Patrick Hwu, Rodabe N. Amaria, Chantale Bernatchez |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | 60% |
| Australia | 1 | 20% |
| Unknown | 1 | 20% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 5 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 100 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 100 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 19 | 19% |
| Researcher | 14 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 10 | 10% |
| Other | 7 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 6 | 6% |
| Other | 15 | 15% |
| Unknown | 29 | 29% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 20 | 20% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 16 | 16% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 14 | 14% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 9 | 9% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 5 | 5% |
| Other | 7 | 7% |
| Unknown | 29 | 29% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 32. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 October 2023.
All research outputs
#1,255,818
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Cancer Research
#842
of 13,372 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#26,168
of 351,492 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Cancer Research
#21
of 191 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,372 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 351,492 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 191 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.