↓ Skip to main content

Genetic structure of the Caribbean giant barrel sponge Xestospongia muta using the I3-M11 partition of COI

Overview of attention for article published in Coral Reefs, October 2008
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
63 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
107 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Genetic structure of the Caribbean giant barrel sponge Xestospongia muta using the I3-M11 partition of COI
Published in
Coral Reefs, October 2008
DOI 10.1007/s00338-008-0430-3
Authors

S. López-Legentil, J. R. Pawlik

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 107 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 3%
Germany 2 2%
Mexico 2 2%
Italy 1 <1%
Colombia 1 <1%
Kenya 1 <1%
Unknown 97 91%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 23 21%
Researcher 22 21%
Student > Master 16 15%
Student > Bachelor 9 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 7%
Other 18 17%
Unknown 12 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 63 59%
Environmental Science 12 11%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 8 7%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 8 7%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 2 2%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 14 13%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 June 2015.
All research outputs
#7,463,244
of 22,817,213 outputs
Outputs from Coral Reefs
#942
of 1,767 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#31,899
of 89,312 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Coral Reefs
#8
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,817,213 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,767 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.2. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 89,312 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 6th percentile – i.e., 6% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.