| Title |
Validation of biomarkers of food intake—critical assessment of candidate biomarkers
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Genes & Nutrition, May 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12263-018-0603-9 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
L. O. Dragsted, Q. Gao, A. Scalbert, G. Vergères, M. Kolehmainen, C. Manach, L. Brennan, L. A. Afman, D. S. Wishart, C. Andres Lacueva, M. Garcia-Aloy, H. Verhagen, E. J. M. Feskens, G. Praticò |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 18 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 3 | 17% |
| Canada | 1 | 6% |
| United States | 1 | 6% |
| Mexico | 1 | 6% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 6% |
| Germany | 1 | 6% |
| Australia | 1 | 6% |
| Belgium | 1 | 6% |
| Italy | 1 | 6% |
| Other | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 6 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 7 | 39% |
| Scientists | 6 | 33% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 4 | 22% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 6% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 210 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 210 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 39 | 19% |
| Researcher | 35 | 17% |
| Student > Master | 22 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 16 | 8% |
| Student > Bachelor | 14 | 7% |
| Other | 30 | 14% |
| Unknown | 54 | 26% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 30 | 14% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 28 | 13% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 23 | 11% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 16 | 8% |
| Chemistry | 13 | 6% |
| Other | 23 | 11% |
| Unknown | 77 | 37% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 35. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 March 2024.
All research outputs
#1,155,334
of 25,507,011 outputs
Outputs from Genes & Nutrition
#18
of 412 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#24,922
of 344,538 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Genes & Nutrition
#2
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,507,011 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 412 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 344,538 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 6 of them.