↓ Skip to main content

Biodegradation of bisphenol A by an algal-bacterial system

Overview of attention for article published in Environmental Science and Pollution Research, May 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
45 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
76 Mendeley
Title
Biodegradation of bisphenol A by an algal-bacterial system
Published in
Environmental Science and Pollution Research, May 2015
DOI 10.1007/s11356-015-4693-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Er Jin Eio, Minako Kawai, Chiaki Niwa, Masato Ito, Shuichi Yamamoto, Tatsuki Toda

Abstract

The degradation of bisphenol A (BPA) by Chlorella sorokiniana and BPA-degrading bacteria was investigated. The results show that BPA was partially removed by a monoculture of C. sorokiniana, but the remaining BPA accounted for 50.2, 56.1, and 60.5 % of the initial BPA concentrations of 10, 20, and 50 mg L(-1), respectively. The total algal BPA adsorption and accumulation were less than 1 %. C. sorokiniana-bacterial system effectively removed BPA with photosynthetic oxygen provided by the algae irrespective of the initial BPA concentration. The growth of C. sorokiniana in the algal system was inhibited by BPA concentrations of 20 and 50 mg L(-1), but not in the algal-bacterial system. This observation indicates that bacterial growth in the algal-bacterial system reduced the BPA-inhibiting effect on algae. A total of ten BPA biodegradation intermediates were identified by GC-MS. The concentrations of the biodegradation intermediates decreased to a low level at the end of the experiment. The hypothetical carbon mass balance analysis showed that the amounts of oxygen demanded by the bacteria are insufficient for effective BPA degradation. However, adding an external carbon source could compensate for the oxygen shortage. This study demonstrates that the algal-bacterial system has the potential to remove BPA and its biodegradation intermediates.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 76 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Japan 1 1%
Unknown 75 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 11 14%
Student > Master 10 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 12%
Student > Bachelor 8 11%
Professor 5 7%
Other 11 14%
Unknown 22 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 12 16%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 10 13%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 9 12%
Chemistry 8 11%
Engineering 6 8%
Other 9 12%
Unknown 22 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 July 2022.
All research outputs
#18,920,037
of 24,115,737 outputs
Outputs from Environmental Science and Pollution Research
#5,185
of 10,015 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#184,376
of 270,536 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Environmental Science and Pollution Research
#87
of 183 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,115,737 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,015 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.8. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 270,536 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 183 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.