↓ Skip to main content

Ruxolitinib for the treatment of inadequately controlled polycythemia vera without splenomegaly: 80-week follow-up from the RESPONSE-2 trial

Overview of attention for article published in Annals of Hematology, May 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (60th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (76th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
6 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
52 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
91 Mendeley
Title
Ruxolitinib for the treatment of inadequately controlled polycythemia vera without splenomegaly: 80-week follow-up from the RESPONSE-2 trial
Published in
Annals of Hematology, May 2018
DOI 10.1007/s00277-018-3365-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

Martin Griesshammer, Guray Saydam, Francesca Palandri, Giulia Benevolo, Miklos Egyed, Jeannie Callum, Timothy Devos, Serdar Sivgin, Paola Guglielmelli, Caroline Bensasson, Mahmudul Khan, Julian Perez Ronco, Francesco Passamonti

Abstract

RESPONSE-2 is a phase 3 study comparing the efficacy and safety of ruxolitinib with the best available therapy (BAT) in hydroxyurea-resistant/hydroxyurea-intolerant polycythemia vera (PV) patients without palpable splenomegaly. This analysis evaluated the durability of the efficacy and safety of ruxolitinib after patients completed the visit at week 80 or discontinued the study. Endpoints included proportion of patients achieving hematocrit control (< 45%), proportion of patients achieving complete hematologic remission (CHR) at week 28, and the durability of hematocrit control and CHR. At the time of analysis, 93% (69/74) of patients randomized to ruxolitinib were receiving ruxolitinib; while in the BAT arm, 77% (58/75) of patients crossed over to ruxolitinib after week 28. No patient remained on BAT by week 80. Among patients who achieved a hematocrit response at week 28, the probability of maintaining response up to week 80 was 78% in the ruxolitinib arm. At week 80, durable CHR was achieved in 18 patients (24%) in the ruxolitinib arm versus 2 patients (3%) in the BAT arm. The safety profile of ruxolitinib was consistent with previous reports. These data support that ruxolitinib treatment should be considered also as a standard of care for hydroxyurea-resistant/hydroxyurea-intolerant PV patients without palpable splenomegaly.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 91 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 91 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 13 14%
Researcher 8 9%
Student > Bachelor 8 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 8%
Other 12 13%
Unknown 36 40%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 33 36%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 6 7%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 5%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 2%
Arts and Humanities 1 1%
Other 5 5%
Unknown 39 43%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 August 2018.
All research outputs
#7,467,774
of 23,083,773 outputs
Outputs from Annals of Hematology
#440
of 2,206 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#129,518
of 330,915 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annals of Hematology
#11
of 46 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,083,773 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,206 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 330,915 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 46 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.