↓ Skip to main content

Efficacy of protracted dose-dense temozolomide in patients with recurrent high-grade glioma

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Neuro-Oncology, September 2010
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
f1000
1 research highlight platform

Citations

dimensions_citation
28 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
41 Mendeley
Title
Efficacy of protracted dose-dense temozolomide in patients with recurrent high-grade glioma
Published in
Journal of Neuro-Oncology, September 2010
DOI 10.1007/s11060-010-0423-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ufuk Abacioglu, Hale B. Caglar, Perran F. Yumuk, Zuleyha Akgun, Beste M. Atasoy, Meric Sengoz

Abstract

The current standard therapy for newly diagnosed glioblastoma is multimodal, comprising surgical resection plus radiotherapy and concurrent temozolomide, then adjuvant temozolomide for 6 months. This has been shown to provide survival benefits; however, the prognosis for these patients remains poor, and most relapse. The objective of this prospective Phase II study was to evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of protracted, dose-dense temozolomide therapy (100 mg/m(2) for 21 consecutive days of a 28-day cycle) in patients with recurrent glioblastoma or grade 3 gliomas who had previously received standard therapy. Of the 25 patients included (median age 50 years), 20 were evaluable for radiologic response. Two patients had partial responses and 10 had stable disease (60% overall clinical benefit); 8 patients (40%) progressed after the first treatment cycle. Five patients were not assessed for radiologic response due to early clinical progression but were included in the progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) analyses. The median follow-up time was 7 months (range, 1-14 months). The median PFS was 3 months (95% confidence interval, CI, 1.8-4.2) and the median OS was 7 months (95% CI 5.1-8.9). The 6-month PFS rate (primary endpoint) was 17.3% (95% CI 1.7-32.2) and the 1-year OS rate was 12% (95% CI -1-25). This regimen was well tolerated. The most frequent adverse event was lymphopenia (grade 3-4 in 20 patients); no opportunistic infections were reported. Treatment was discontinued due to toxicity in 2 patients (grade 4 hepatic toxicity and thrombocytopenia). These data suggest that protracted, dose-dense temozolomide had modest activity with manageable toxicity in patients with recurrent high-grade glioma previously treated with temozolomide.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 41 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 2 5%
Uruguay 1 2%
India 1 2%
Unknown 37 90%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 6 15%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 10%
Professor 4 10%
Student > Bachelor 3 7%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 7%
Other 11 27%
Unknown 10 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 16 39%
Neuroscience 4 10%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 7%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 2%
Other 2 5%
Unknown 12 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 October 2011.
All research outputs
#13,356,164
of 22,655,397 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Neuro-Oncology
#1,683
of 2,955 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#75,897
of 98,505 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Neuro-Oncology
#17
of 19 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,655,397 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,955 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.2. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 98,505 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 19 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 5th percentile – i.e., 5% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.