| Title |
Das normale sagittale Profil der Halswirbelsäule – muss die Halswirbelsäule immer lordotisch sein?
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Die Orthopädie, May 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00132-018-3580-1 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
M. Akbar, H. Almansour, B. Diebo, D. Adler, W. Pepke, M. Richter |
| Abstract |
The cervical spine is very complex, and it allows the largest range of motion relative to the rest of the spine. The fundamental function of the cervical spine is to maintain the head balanced over the trunk and to maintain horizontal gaze. The cervical spine must be both stable and flexible to guarantee function. Changes of the sagittal profile of the cervical spine may affect function and quality of life. The relationship between full body alignment and maintaining gaze necessitates a thorough understanding of the cranio-spino-pelvic alignment as a component of balance. Now the question is, what kind of sagittal profile does the cervical spine need for proper function? In the literature, normal sagittal alignment of the cervical spine is controversial. In general, there is the assumption that the alignment is lordotic. Does the data in the literature support this? The present literature review supports the following facts: Ideal cervical spine alignment is mostly lordotic, but not always; ideal cervical spine alignment can be lordotic, neutral or kyphotic; ideal cervical spine alignment is driven by the necessity of supporting the head and maintaining horizontal gaze; the cervical spine is in harmony with regional alignment (thoracic kyphosis) and sagittal global alignment (SVA): TK (↑) → T1 Slope (↑) → CL (↑), TK (↓) → T1 Slope (↓) → CL (↓), SVA >50 mm: the cervical curve should be lordotic to maintain horizontal gaze, SVA <0 mm: the cervical curve should be kyphotic to maintain horizontal gaze. |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 8 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 8 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 3 | 38% |
| Other | 2 | 25% |
| Unknown | 3 | 38% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 5 | 63% |
| Unknown | 3 | 38% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 May 2018.
All research outputs
#22,767,715
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from Die Orthopädie
#276
of 678 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#302,370
of 344,275 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Die Orthopädie
#3
of 25 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 678 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 1.5. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 344,275 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 25 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.