↓ Skip to main content

Non-contact scanning diffuse correlation tomography system for three-dimensional blood flow imaging in a murine bone graft model

Overview of attention for article published in Biomedical Optics Express, June 2015
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
20 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
40 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Non-contact scanning diffuse correlation tomography system for three-dimensional blood flow imaging in a murine bone graft model
Published in
Biomedical Optics Express, June 2015
DOI 10.1364/boe.6.002695
Pubmed ID
Authors

Songfeng Han, Johannes Johansson, Miguel Mireles, Ashley R. Proctor, Michael D. Hoffman, Joseph B. Vella, Danielle S. W. Benoit, Turgut Durduran, Regine Choe

Abstract

A non-contact galvanometer-based optical scanning system for diffuse correlation tomography was developed for monitoring bone graft healing in a murine femur model. A linear image reconstruction algorithm for diffuse correlation tomography was tested using finite-element method based simulated data and experimental data from a femur or a tube suspended in a homogeneous liquid phantom. Finally, the non-contact system was utilized to monitor in vivo blood flow changes prior to and one week after bone graft transplantation within murine femurs. Localized blood flow changes were observed in three mice, demonstrating a potential for quantification of longitudinal blood flow associated with bone graft healing.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 40 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 5%
Unknown 38 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 28%
Researcher 5 13%
Student > Postgraduate 5 13%
Student > Master 4 10%
Professor > Associate Professor 3 8%
Other 6 15%
Unknown 6 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 17 43%
Physics and Astronomy 10 25%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 8%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 8%
Unspecified 1 3%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 6 15%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 July 2015.
All research outputs
#22,758,309
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Biomedical Optics Express
#2,266
of 3,044 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#236,905
of 278,169 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biomedical Optics Express
#35
of 41 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,044 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.9. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 278,169 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 41 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.