↓ Skip to main content

Human Activity Recognition from Body Sensor Data using Deep Learning

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Medical Systems, April 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
82 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
136 Mendeley
Title
Human Activity Recognition from Body Sensor Data using Deep Learning
Published in
Journal of Medical Systems, April 2018
DOI 10.1007/s10916-018-0948-z
Pubmed ID
Authors

Mohammad Mehedi Hassan, Shamsul Huda, Md Zia Uddin, Ahmad Almogren, Majed Alrubaian

Abstract

In recent years, human activity recognition from body sensor data or wearable sensor data has become a considerable research attention from academia and health industry. This research can be useful for various e-health applications such as monitoring elderly and physical impaired people at Smart home to improve their rehabilitation processes. However, it is not easy to accurately and automatically recognize physical human activity through wearable sensors due to the complexity and variety of body activities. In this paper, we address the human activity recognition problem as a classification problem using wearable body sensor data. In particular, we propose to utilize a Deep Belief Network (DBN) model for successful human activity recognition. First, we extract the important initial features from the raw body sensor data. Then, a kernel principal component analysis (KPCA) and linear discriminant analysis (LDA) are performed to further process the features and make them more robust to be useful for fast activity recognition. Finally, the DBN is trained by these features. Various experiments were performed on a real-world wearable sensor dataset to verify the effectiveness of the deep learning algorithm. The results show that the proposed DBN outperformed other algorithms and achieves satisfactory activity recognition performance.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 136 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 136 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 27 20%
Student > Master 15 11%
Student > Bachelor 11 8%
Researcher 10 7%
Lecturer 5 4%
Other 20 15%
Unknown 48 35%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Computer Science 36 26%
Engineering 22 16%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 3%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 2%
Psychology 3 2%
Other 15 11%
Unknown 53 39%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 June 2018.
All research outputs
#16,866,549
of 24,797,973 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Medical Systems
#731
of 1,234 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#195,013
of 301,903 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Medical Systems
#19
of 45 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,797,973 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,234 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.1. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 301,903 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 45 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.