↓ Skip to main content

p53 Mutations in Human Cancers

Overview of attention for article published in Science, July 1991
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
2 blogs
policy
5 policy sources
patent
188 patents
wikipedia
7 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
6772 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
846 Mendeley
citeulike
4 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
p53 Mutations in Human Cancers
Published in
Science, July 1991
DOI 10.1126/science.1905840
Pubmed ID
Authors

Monica Hollstein, David Sidransky, Bert Vogelstein, Curtis C. Harris

Abstract

Mutations in the evolutionarily conserved codons of the p53 tumor suppressor gene are common in diverse types of human cancer. The p53 mutational spectrum differs among cancers of the colon, lung, esophagus, breast, liver, brain, reticuloendothelial tissues, and hemopoietic tissues. Analysis of these mutations can provide clues to the etiology of these diverse tumors and to the function of specific regions of p53. Transitions predominate in colon, brain, and lymphoid malignancies, whereas G:C to T:A transversions are the most frequent substitutions observed in cancers of the lung and liver. Mutations at A:T base pairs are seen more frequently in esophageal carcinomas than in other solid tumors. Most transitions in colorectal carcinomas, brain tumors, leukemias, and lymphomas are at CpG dinucleotide mutational hot spots. G to T transversions in lung, breast, and esophageal carcinomas are dispersed among numerous codons. In liver tumors in persons from geographic areas in which both aflatoxin B1 and hepatitis B virus are cancer risk factors, most mutations are at one nucleotide pair of codon 249. These differences may reflect the etiological contributions of both exogenous and endogenous factors to human carcinogenesis.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 846 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 7 <1%
United Kingdom 5 <1%
Germany 3 <1%
Sweden 2 <1%
Japan 2 <1%
Canada 2 <1%
France 1 <1%
Finland 1 <1%
Ukraine 1 <1%
Other 6 <1%
Unknown 816 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 191 23%
Student > Bachelor 119 14%
Student > Master 116 14%
Researcher 88 10%
Student > Postgraduate 33 4%
Other 116 14%
Unknown 183 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 208 25%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 181 21%
Medicine and Dentistry 120 14%
Chemistry 33 4%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 20 2%
Other 84 10%
Unknown 200 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 48. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 April 2024.
All research outputs
#891,061
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Science
#17,514
of 83,358 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#118
of 16,288 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Science
#1
of 168 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 83,358 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 65.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 16,288 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 168 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.