↓ Skip to main content

A Point Mutation in a Herpesvirus Polymerase Determines Neuropathogenicity

Overview of attention for article published in PLoS Pathogens, November 2007
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (73rd percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (53rd percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
patent
2 patents

Citations

dimensions_citation
181 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
78 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A Point Mutation in a Herpesvirus Polymerase Determines Neuropathogenicity
Published in
PLoS Pathogens, November 2007
DOI 10.1371/journal.ppat.0030160
Pubmed ID
Authors

Laura B Goodman, Arianna Loregian, Gillian A Perkins, Josie Nugent, Elizabeth L Buckles, Beatrice Mercorelli, Julia H Kydd, Giorgio Palù, Ken C Smith, Nikolaus Osterrieder, Nicholas Davis-Poynter

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 78 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 1%
Russia 1 1%
Kenya 1 1%
Canada 1 1%
Unknown 74 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 14%
Researcher 10 13%
Student > Master 10 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 9%
Student > Bachelor 4 5%
Other 19 24%
Unknown 17 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 20 26%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 14 18%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 10 13%
Medicine and Dentistry 9 12%
Immunology and Microbiology 4 5%
Other 2 3%
Unknown 19 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 February 2013.
All research outputs
#5,446,994
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from PLoS Pathogens
#4,480
of 9,467 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#16,554
of 90,593 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLoS Pathogens
#20
of 43 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,467 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 90,593 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 43 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.