↓ Skip to main content

American College of Cardiology

Esophageal Deviation During Atrial Fibrillation Ablation Clinical Experience With a Dedicated Esophageal Balloon Retractor

Overview of attention for article published in JACC: Clinical Electrophysiology, May 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (91st percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (75th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
25 X users
patent
2 patents

Citations

dimensions_citation
54 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
37 Mendeley
Title
Esophageal Deviation During Atrial Fibrillation Ablation Clinical Experience With a Dedicated Esophageal Balloon Retractor
Published in
JACC: Clinical Electrophysiology, May 2018
DOI 10.1016/j.jacep.2018.04.001
Pubmed ID
Authors

Rahul Bhardwaj, Aditi Naniwadekar, William Whang, Alexander J Mittnacht, Chandrasekar Palaniswamy, Jacob S Koruth, Kamal Joshi, Aamir Sofi, Marc Miller, Subbarao Choudry, Srinivas R Dukkipati, Vivek Y Reddy

Abstract

The goal of this study was to determine the safety and feasibility of a novel esophageal balloon retractor (DV8) for MED during PVI. The authors previously showed that mechanical esophageal deviation (MED) is feasible using an off-the-shelf metal stylet to allow uninterrupted ablation along the posterior left atrium during pulmonary vein isolation (PVI). Although it is an attractive strategy to avoid esophageal thermal injury, this technique was hampered by both the propensity for oropharyngeal trauma from the stiff stylet and the limited lateral esophageal displacement. In 200 consecutive patients undergoing atrial fibrillation ablation, the DV8 balloon retractor was used for MED; contrast was instilled into the esophagus to accurately delineate the trailing esophageal edge. Deviation was performed to maximize the distance from the trailing esophageal edge to the closest point of the ablation line (MEDEffective) and correlated to occurrences of luminal esophageal temperature elevation. In patients undergoing MED during a first-ever PVI of 304 vein pairs, the MEDEffective during right and left PVI were 21.2 ± 8.7 mm and 15.5 ± 6.8 mm, respectively. Deviation of at least 5 mm of MEDEffective was achievable in 97.7%. Luminal esophageal temperature increases universally occurred (100%) at MEDEffective <5 mm, less often (28%) at MEDEffective 5 to 20 mm, and rarely (1.9%) at MEDEffective >20 mm. There were no esophageal complications, but 2 patients experienced oropharyngeal bleeding due to trauma related to device placement. MED with the balloon retractor safely moved the esophagus away from the site of energy delivery during atrial fibrillation ablation.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 25 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 37 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 37 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 6 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 11%
Student > Postgraduate 4 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 8%
Researcher 2 5%
Other 5 14%
Unknown 13 35%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 12 32%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 5%
Arts and Humanities 1 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 3%
Mathematics 1 3%
Other 5 14%
Unknown 15 41%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 27. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 April 2023.
All research outputs
#1,454,518
of 25,728,350 outputs
Outputs from JACC: Clinical Electrophysiology
#310
of 1,578 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#30,514
of 345,283 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JACC: Clinical Electrophysiology
#11
of 44 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,728,350 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,578 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 345,283 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 44 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.