| Title |
Distribution and Evolution of Bacteriophage WO in Wolbachia, the Endosymbiont Causing Sexual Alterations in Arthropods
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Molecular Evolution, November 2000
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s002390010112 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Shinji Masui, Satoru Kamoda, Tetsuhiko Sasaki, Hajime Ishikawa |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 134 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 1% |
| Spain | 2 | 1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Mexico | 1 | <1% |
| Switzerland | 1 | <1% |
| Czechia | 1 | <1% |
| China | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 124 | 93% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 42 | 31% |
| Researcher | 25 | 19% |
| Professor | 13 | 10% |
| Student > Master | 12 | 9% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 10 | 7% |
| Other | 20 | 15% |
| Unknown | 12 | 9% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 86 | 64% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 14 | 10% |
| Environmental Science | 8 | 6% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 3 | 2% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 2 | 1% |
| Other | 8 | 6% |
| Unknown | 13 | 10% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 March 2020.
All research outputs
#5,611,796
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Molecular Evolution
#284
of 1,530 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,095
of 42,507 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Molecular Evolution
#1
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,530 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 42,507 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them