↓ Skip to main content

Climate, niche, ticks, and models: what they are and how we should interpret them

Overview of attention for article published in Parasitology Research, November 2008
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
102 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
202 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Climate, niche, ticks, and models: what they are and how we should interpret them
Published in
Parasitology Research, November 2008
DOI 10.1007/s00436-008-1056-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

Agustín Estrada-Peña

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 202 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 1%
Hungary 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Chile 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Other 2 <1%
Unknown 189 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 37 18%
Researcher 37 18%
Student > Master 28 14%
Student > Bachelor 20 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 16 8%
Other 34 17%
Unknown 30 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 71 35%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 24 12%
Environmental Science 21 10%
Medicine and Dentistry 9 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 7 3%
Other 34 17%
Unknown 36 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 September 2010.
All research outputs
#7,463,244
of 22,817,213 outputs
Outputs from Parasitology Research
#622
of 3,785 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#47,945
of 166,216 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Parasitology Research
#10
of 22 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,817,213 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,785 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 166,216 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 22 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 4th percentile – i.e., 4% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.