↓ Skip to main content

“I was told that I would not die from heart failure”: Patient perceptions of prognosis communication

Overview of attention for article published in Applied Nursing Research, March 2018
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
17 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
54 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
“I was told that I would not die from heart failure”: Patient perceptions of prognosis communication
Published in
Applied Nursing Research, March 2018
DOI 10.1016/j.apnr.2018.03.007
Pubmed ID
Authors

Lisa Hjelmfors, Anna Sandgren, Anna Strömberg, Jan Mårtensson, Tiny Jaarsma, Maria Friedrichsen

Abstract

To describe patients' experiences of communication about their heart failure prognosis and explore how these experiences affected their preferences for future communication about the prognosis. Professionals need to discuss about the heart failure prognosis with patients in order to improve their understanding of their illness and address palliative care needs. An inductive and exploratory design was used. A total of 24 patients (75% men, 52-87 years of age) in New York Heart Association class I-III from primary outpatient care participated in focus group-, or individual semi-structured interviews. Thematic analysis was used to identify and interpret patterns in the data. Two overarching themes, "The message sent" and "Hoping for the best or preparing for the worst", each with three sub-themes, were discovered during the thematic analysis. Many patients described that professionals had not provided them with any prognosis information at all. Other patients described professional information about prognosis that was given in an either very optimistic or very negative way. However, patients also described situations where professionals had given information in a way that they thought was perfect for them to handle, and in accordance with their preferences. This study shows that patients have different experiences and preferences for communication about prognosis and uses different approaches in order to cope living with a chronic illness such as heart failure.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 54 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 54 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 11 20%
Student > Master 6 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 9%
Researcher 4 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 6%
Other 5 9%
Unknown 20 37%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 16 30%
Medicine and Dentistry 11 20%
Social Sciences 2 4%
Psychology 2 4%
Unspecified 1 2%
Other 3 6%
Unknown 19 35%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 June 2018.
All research outputs
#22,767,715
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from Applied Nursing Research
#508
of 564 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#309,840
of 350,479 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Applied Nursing Research
#9
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 564 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.0. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 350,479 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.