| Title |
Construction of an annotated corpus to support biomedical information extraction
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Bioinformatics, October 2009
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1471-2105-10-349 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Paul Thompson, Syed A Iqbal, John McNaught, Sophia Ananiadou |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 102 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 9 | 9% |
| United Kingdom | 4 | 4% |
| Brazil | 2 | 2% |
| Turkey | 1 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| Czechia | 1 | <1% |
| Colombia | 1 | <1% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| Denmark | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 3 | 3% |
| Unknown | 78 | 76% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 28 | 27% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 22 | 22% |
| Student > Master | 14 | 14% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 6 | 6% |
| Professor | 5 | 5% |
| Other | 17 | 17% |
| Unknown | 10 | 10% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Computer Science | 43 | 42% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 17 | 17% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 9 | 9% |
| Linguistics | 5 | 5% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 3% |
| Other | 11 | 11% |
| Unknown | 14 | 14% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 June 2015.
All research outputs
#7,463,244
of 22,817,213 outputs
Outputs from BMC Bioinformatics
#3,023
of 7,284 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#33,753
of 94,030 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Bioinformatics
#28
of 61 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,817,213 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,284 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 94,030 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 61 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.