↓ Skip to main content

Evaluation of Childhood Vaccine Refusal and Hesitancy Intentions in Turkey

Overview of attention for article published in Indian Journal of Pediatrics, June 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (60th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (72nd percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
37 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
106 Mendeley
Title
Evaluation of Childhood Vaccine Refusal and Hesitancy Intentions in Turkey
Published in
Indian Journal of Pediatrics, June 2018
DOI 10.1007/s12098-018-2714-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

Seda Topçu, Habip Almış, Sevgi Başkan, Mehmet Turgut, Filiz Şimşek Orhon, Betül Ulukol

Abstract

To assess the factors affecting parental childhood vaccine refusal and hesitancy (CVRH) intentions in Turkey. A total of 33 children's parents who were referred to two different child health care clinics because of CVRH and 99 controls were enrolled into this study from November through December 2017. The socio-demographic characteristics and perceptions of the parents who refused at least one vaccine for their child/children were compared with controls. The monthly household income was significantly lower in CVRH group than control group. Refusal of the heel stick, refusal of hearing test, not using baby car seat, irregular use of vitamin D and iron prophylaxis, using alterative/complementary medicine, distrust in vaccines were the parameters which were found significantly higher in refused vaccine group than in control group. The beliefs "It may be dangerous for children" and "Distrust to the vaccines" were the most determined factors with a ratio of 51.5% in CVRH group. This is the first study conducted to investigate the social-demographic characteristics and perception of parental CVRH in Turkey. The beliefs "It may be dangerous for the children" and "Distrust the vaccines" were the most determined factors which may affect CVRH. Some child health protective strategies were less undertaken in CVRH group than in controls; including heel stick test, hearing test, using baby car seat and using of Vitamin D and iron prophylaxis. The parents who have CVRH intentions tend to behave irresponsibly in care of their children.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 106 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 106 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 17 16%
Student > Master 14 13%
Researcher 10 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 8%
Professor > Associate Professor 6 6%
Other 12 11%
Unknown 38 36%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 21 20%
Nursing and Health Professions 17 16%
Social Sciences 9 8%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 3 3%
Business, Management and Accounting 2 2%
Other 12 11%
Unknown 42 40%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 July 2023.
All research outputs
#7,715,945
of 23,989,683 outputs
Outputs from Indian Journal of Pediatrics
#301
of 1,649 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#128,860
of 333,985 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Indian Journal of Pediatrics
#6
of 18 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,989,683 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,649 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 333,985 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 18 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.