↓ Skip to main content

Pathogenicity of H5 influenza viruses for ducks

Overview of attention for article published in Archives of Virology, March 2005
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
89 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
47 Mendeley
connotea
2 Connotea
Title
Pathogenicity of H5 influenza viruses for ducks
Published in
Archives of Virology, March 2005
DOI 10.1007/s00705-004-0473-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

N. Kishida, Y. Sakoda, N. Isoda, K. Matsuda, M. Eto, Y. Sunaga, T. Umemura, H. Kida

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 47 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Réunion 1 2%
Kenya 1 2%
United Kingdom 1 2%
Saudi Arabia 1 2%
Denmark 1 2%
Unknown 42 89%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 13 28%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 17%
Student > Bachelor 4 9%
Professor > Associate Professor 4 9%
Student > Master 4 9%
Other 10 21%
Unknown 4 9%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 23 49%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 8 17%
Environmental Science 3 6%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 6%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 6%
Other 3 6%
Unknown 4 9%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 March 2006.
All research outputs
#7,463,244
of 22,817,213 outputs
Outputs from Archives of Virology
#918
of 4,157 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#20,628
of 59,451 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Archives of Virology
#5
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,817,213 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,157 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.8. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 59,451 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.