↓ Skip to main content

Production ofl-malic acid from fumaric acid by resting cells ofBrevibacterium sp.

Overview of attention for article published in Applied Biochemistry and Biotechnology, March 1996
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

patent
1 patent

Citations

dimensions_citation
8 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
6 Mendeley
Title
Production ofl-malic acid from fumaric acid by resting cells ofBrevibacterium sp.
Published in
Applied Biochemistry and Biotechnology, March 1996
DOI 10.1007/bf02941728
Authors

C. S. Gong, Ningjun Cao, Yan Sun, G. T. Tsao

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 6 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 6 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 2 33%
Unknown 4 67%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Computer Science 1 17%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 17%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 17%
Unknown 3 50%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 January 2005.
All research outputs
#7,569,361
of 23,085,832 outputs
Outputs from Applied Biochemistry and Biotechnology
#544
of 2,533 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,272
of 26,989 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Applied Biochemistry and Biotechnology
#17
of 34 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,085,832 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,533 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.2. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 26,989 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 34 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 2nd percentile – i.e., 2% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.