| Title |
Nanoparticle analysis and characterization methodologies in environmental risk assessment of engineered nanoparticles
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Ecotoxicology, May 2008
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10646-008-0225-x |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Martin Hassellöv, James W. Readman, James F. Ranville, Karen Tiede |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 697 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 10 | 1% |
| Germany | 6 | <1% |
| Portugal | 4 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 4 | <1% |
| Canada | 4 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 3 | <1% |
| Brazil | 2 | <1% |
| France | 2 | <1% |
| India | 2 | <1% |
| Other | 12 | 2% |
| Unknown | 648 | 93% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 160 | 23% |
| Researcher | 119 | 17% |
| Student > Master | 106 | 15% |
| Student > Bachelor | 61 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 25 | 4% |
| Other | 97 | 14% |
| Unknown | 129 | 19% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Chemistry | 115 | 16% |
| Environmental Science | 106 | 15% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 82 | 12% |
| Engineering | 59 | 8% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 31 | 4% |
| Other | 140 | 20% |
| Unknown | 164 | 24% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 22. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 May 2023.
All research outputs
#1,735,284
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Ecotoxicology
#43
of 1,566 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,340
of 99,985 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Ecotoxicology
#1
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,566 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 99,985 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.