↓ Skip to main content

Equidecomposability of Polyhedra: A Solution of Hilbert’s Third Problem in Kraków before ICM 1900

Overview of attention for article published in The Mathematical Intelligencer, May 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (79th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
wikipedia
4 Wikipedia pages

Readers on

mendeley
1 Mendeley
Title
Equidecomposability of Polyhedra: A Solution of Hilbert’s Third Problem in Kraków before ICM 1900
Published in
The Mathematical Intelligencer, May 2018
DOI 10.1007/s00283-017-9748-4
Authors

Danuta Ciesielska, Krzysztof Ciesielski

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1 Mendeley reader of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 1 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Professor 1 100%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Unknown 1 100%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 February 2022.
All research outputs
#3,352,849
of 23,815,455 outputs
Outputs from The Mathematical Intelligencer
#94
of 700 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#68,215
of 332,694 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The Mathematical Intelligencer
#3
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,815,455 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 700 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 332,694 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 3 of them.