| Title |
Schadstoffe im Innenraum – aktuelle Handlungsfelder
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Bundesgesundheitsblatt - Gesundheitsforschung - Gesundheitsschutz, May 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00103-018-2737-8 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Wolfram Birmili, Marike Kolossa-Gehring, Kerttu Valtanen, Małgorzata Dębiak, Tunga Salthammer |
| Abstract |
People in Central Europe spend most of their time in private dwellings, offices, education centres or other public buildings. In these indoor places, they are exposed to a variety of gaseous or particulate pollutants that potentially exert adverse health effects. This work compiles current fields of action that are discussed in the public, among expert panels, and in the scientific community. These address ventilation in buildings, the impact of building product emissions and particulate matter sources on indoor air quality, the detection and prevention of mould as well as the assessment of indoor air quality using guidance values and the determination of the internal exposure by human biomonitoring. Indoor air quality appears as a dynamic field of action that has become more complex due to the interaction between new chemicals introduced into the indoor environment through a variety of products and the observed reduction of ventilation rates. Implications for human health have thus become less predictable. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 2 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 13 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 13 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Lecturer | 2 | 15% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 2 | 15% |
| Researcher | 2 | 15% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 8% |
| Student > Master | 1 | 8% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 5 | 38% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 2 | 15% |
| Engineering | 2 | 15% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 2 | 15% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 8% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 1 | 8% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 5 | 38% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 October 2022.
All research outputs
#13,898,915
of 23,570,677 outputs
Outputs from Bundesgesundheitsblatt - Gesundheitsforschung - Gesundheitsschutz
#567
of 948 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#171,305
of 329,018 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Bundesgesundheitsblatt - Gesundheitsforschung - Gesundheitsschutz
#11
of 21 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,570,677 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 948 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.1. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 329,018 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 21 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.