↓ Skip to main content

Insights into Hox Protein Function from a Large Scale Combinatorial Analysis of Protein Domains

Overview of attention for article published in PLoS Genetics, October 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (66th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (54th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
33 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
58 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Insights into Hox Protein Function from a Large Scale Combinatorial Analysis of Protein Domains
Published in
PLoS Genetics, October 2011
DOI 10.1371/journal.pgen.1002302
Pubmed ID
Authors

Samir Merabet, Isma Litim-Mecheri, Daniel Karlsson, Richa Dixit, Mehdi Saadaoui, Bruno Monier, Christine Brun, Stefan Thor, K. Vijayraghavan, Laurent Perrin, Jacques Pradel, Yacine Graba

Abstract

Protein function is encoded within protein sequence and protein domains. However, how protein domains cooperate within a protein to modulate overall activity and how this impacts functional diversification at the molecular and organism levels remains largely unaddressed. Focusing on three domains of the central class Drosophila Hox transcription factor AbdominalA (AbdA), we used combinatorial domain mutations and most known AbdA developmental functions as biological readouts to investigate how protein domains collectively shape protein activity. The results uncover redundancy, interactivity, and multifunctionality of protein domains as salient features underlying overall AbdA protein activity, providing means to apprehend functional diversity and accounting for the robustness of Hox-controlled developmental programs. Importantly, the results highlight context-dependency in protein domain usage and interaction, allowing major modifications in domains to be tolerated without general functional loss. The non-pleoitropic effect of domain mutation suggests that protein modification may contribute more broadly to molecular changes underlying morphological diversification during evolution, so far thought to rely largely on modification in gene cis-regulatory sequences.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 58 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
France 1 2%
Argentina 1 2%
Unknown 56 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 22 38%
Student > Ph. D. Student 15 26%
Other 4 7%
Professor 3 5%
Student > Bachelor 2 3%
Other 8 14%
Unknown 4 7%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 37 64%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 14 24%
Chemical Engineering 1 2%
Arts and Humanities 1 2%
Engineering 1 2%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 4 7%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 November 2011.
All research outputs
#8,436,572
of 25,806,080 outputs
Outputs from PLoS Genetics
#5,290
of 9,003 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#50,645
of 153,565 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLoS Genetics
#56
of 133 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,806,080 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 66th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,003 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 17.8. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 153,565 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 133 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.