| Title |
Understanding investor perceptions of financial statement fraud and their use of red flags: evidence from the field
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Review of Accounting Studies, June 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s11142-015-9326-y |
| Authors |
Joseph F. Brazel, Keith L. Jones, Jane Thayer, Rick C. Warne |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 199 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | 2% |
| Indonesia | 1 | <1% |
| Malaysia | 1 | <1% |
| Japan | 1 | <1% |
| Hong Kong | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 192 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 45 | 23% |
| Student > Master | 23 | 12% |
| Lecturer | 18 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 15 | 8% |
| Student > Bachelor | 9 | 5% |
| Other | 34 | 17% |
| Unknown | 55 | 28% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Business, Management and Accounting | 94 | 47% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 26 | 13% |
| Social Sciences | 8 | 4% |
| Computer Science | 3 | 2% |
| Arts and Humanities | 2 | 1% |
| Other | 4 | 2% |
| Unknown | 62 | 31% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 June 2015.
All research outputs
#6,421,645
of 22,817,213 outputs
Outputs from Review of Accounting Studies
#56
of 174 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#74,853
of 262,898 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Review of Accounting Studies
#3
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,817,213 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 70th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 174 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 262,898 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.