| Title |
Cattle discriminate between familiar and unfamiliar conspecifics by using only head visual cues
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Animal Cognition, December 2010
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10071-010-0361-6 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Marjorie Coulon, Claude Baudoin, Yvan Heyman, Bertrand L. Deputte |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 21 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 10% |
| Belgium | 1 | 5% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 5% |
| Germany | 1 | 5% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 5% |
| Poland | 1 | 5% |
| Norway | 1 | 5% |
| Canada | 1 | 5% |
| France | 1 | 5% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 11 | 52% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 16 | 76% |
| Scientists | 3 | 14% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 10% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 113 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Hungary | 1 | <1% |
| Italy | 1 | <1% |
| Austria | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 108 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 24 | 21% |
| Researcher | 21 | 19% |
| Student > Master | 18 | 16% |
| Student > Bachelor | 14 | 12% |
| Lecturer | 4 | 4% |
| Other | 11 | 10% |
| Unknown | 21 | 19% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 57 | 50% |
| Psychology | 13 | 12% |
| Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 3 | 3% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 3 | 3% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 10 | 9% |
| Unknown | 25 | 22% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 18. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 February 2020.
All research outputs
#2,094,412
of 25,708,267 outputs
Outputs from Animal Cognition
#431
of 1,583 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#10,968
of 192,084 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Animal Cognition
#5
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,708,267 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,583 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 192,084 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its contemporaries.