↓ Skip to main content

Existing and potentially novel functional markers of vitamin D status: a systematic review

Overview of attention for article published in American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, April 2009
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (85th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

policy
3 policy sources

Citations

dimensions_citation
227 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
210 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Existing and potentially novel functional markers of vitamin D status: a systematic review
Published in
American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, April 2009
DOI 10.3945/ajcn.2009.27230d
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kelly M Seamans, Kevin D Cashman

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 210 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 4 2%
Netherlands 2 <1%
France 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
New Zealand 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Unknown 198 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 47 22%
Student > Ph. D. Student 23 11%
Researcher 21 10%
Student > Bachelor 19 9%
Other 15 7%
Other 46 22%
Unknown 39 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 64 30%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 31 15%
Nursing and Health Professions 19 9%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 14 7%
Social Sciences 8 4%
Other 28 13%
Unknown 46 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 October 2023.
All research outputs
#3,907,044
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from American Journal of Clinical Nutrition
#5,015
of 12,718 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#13,433
of 107,803 outputs
Outputs of similar age from American Journal of Clinical Nutrition
#58
of 103 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,718 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 38.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 107,803 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 103 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.