↓ Skip to main content

The Role of Variation at AβPP, PSEN1, PSEN2, and MAPT in Late Onset Alzheimer's Disease

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Alzheimer's Disease, January 2012
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
53 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
152 Mendeley
citeulike
3 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The Role of Variation at AβPP, PSEN1, PSEN2, and MAPT in Late Onset Alzheimer's Disease
Published in
Journal of Alzheimer's Disease, January 2012
DOI 10.3233/jad-2011-110824
Pubmed ID
Authors

Amy Gerrish, Giancarlo Russo, Alexander Richards, Valentina Moskvina, Dobril Ivanov, Denise Harold, Rebecca Sims, Richard Abraham, Paul Hollingworth, Jade Chapman, Marian Hamshere, Jaspreet Singh Pahwa, Kimberley Dowzell, Amy Williams, Nicola Jones, Charlene Thomas, Alexandra Stretton, Angharad R. Morgan, Simon Lovestone, John Powell, Petroula Proitsi, Michelle K. Lupton, Carol Brayne, David C. Rubinsztein, Michael Gill, Brian Lawlor, Aoibhinn Lynch, Kevin Morgan, Kristelle S. Brown, Peter A. Passmore, David Craig, Bernadette McGuinness, Stephen Todd, Janet A. Johnston, Clive Holmes, David Mann, A. David Smith, Seth Love, Patrick G. Kehoe, John Hardy, Simon Mead, Nick Fox, Martin Rossor, John Collinge, Wolfgang Maier, Frank Jessen, Heike Kölsch, Reinhard Heun, Britta Schürmann, Hendrik van den Bussche, Isabella Heuser, Johannes Kornhuber, Jens Wiltfang, Martin Dichgans, Lutz Frölich, Harald Hampel, Michael Hüll, Dan Rujescu, Alison M. Goate, John S. K Kauwe, Carlos Cruchaga, Petra Nowotny, John C. Morris, Kevin Mayo, Gill Livingston, Nicholas J. Bass, Hugh Gurling, Andrew McQuillin, Rhian Gwilliam, Panagiotis Deloukas, Gail Davies, Sarah E. Harris, John M. Starr, Ian J. Deary, Ammar Al-Chalabi, Christopher E. Shaw, Magda Tsolaki, Andrew B. Singleton, Rita Guerreiro, Thomas W. Mühleisen, Markus M. Nöthen, Susanne Moebus, Karl-Heinz Jöckel, Norman Klopp, H-Erich Wichmann, Minerva M Carrasquillo, V Shane Pankratz, Steven G. Younkin, Lesley Jones, Peter A Holmans, Michael C. O'Donovan, Michael J. Owen, Julie Williams

Abstract

Rare mutations in AβPP, PSEN1, and PSEN2 cause uncommon early onset forms of Alzheimer's disease (AD), and common variants in MAPT are associated with risk of other neurodegenerative disorders. We sought to establish whether common genetic variation in these genes confer risk to the common form of AD which occurs later in life (>65 years). We therefore tested single-nucleotide polymorphisms at these loci for association with late-onset AD (LOAD) in a large case-control sample consisting of 3,940 cases and 13,373 controls. Single-marker analysis did not identify any variants that reached genome-wide significance, a result which is supported by other recent genome-wide association studies. However, we did observe a significant association at the MAPT locus using a gene-wide approach (p = 0.009). We also observed suggestive association between AD and the marker rs9468, which defines the H1 haplotype, an extended haplotype that spans the MAPT gene and has previously been implicated in other neurodegenerative disorders including Parkinson's disease, progressive supranuclear palsy, and corticobasal degeneration. In summary common variants at AβPP, PSEN1, and PSEN2 and MAPT are unlikely to make strong contributions to susceptibility for LOAD. However, the gene-wide effect observed at MAPT indicates a possible contribution to disease risk which requires further study.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 152 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 2 1%
Spain 2 1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
China 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 144 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 32 21%
Student > Ph. D. Student 22 14%
Student > Master 20 13%
Professor 16 11%
Student > Bachelor 15 10%
Other 24 16%
Unknown 23 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 37 24%
Medicine and Dentistry 23 15%
Neuroscience 19 13%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 16 11%
Psychology 10 7%
Other 18 12%
Unknown 29 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 October 2011.
All research outputs
#17,289,387
of 25,377,790 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Alzheimer's Disease
#6,623
of 7,452 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#172,481
of 250,127 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Alzheimer's Disease
#116
of 173 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,377,790 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,452 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.2. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 250,127 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 173 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.