↓ Skip to main content

Five-Year Prognosis in an Incident Cohort of People Presenting with Acute Myocardial Infarction

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, October 2011
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
30 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
66 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Five-Year Prognosis in an Incident Cohort of People Presenting with Acute Myocardial Infarction
Published in
PLOS ONE, October 2011
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0026573
Pubmed ID
Authors

Colin R. Simpson, Brian S. Buckley, David J. McLernon, Aziz Sheikh, Andrew Murphy, Philip C. Hannaford

Abstract

Following an AMI, it is important for patients and their physicians to appreciate the subsequent risk of death, and the potential benefits of invasive cardiac procedures and secondary preventive therapy. Studies, to-date, have focused largely on high-risk populations. We wished to determine the risk of death in a population-derived cohort of 2,887 patients after a first acute myocardial infarction (AMI).

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 66 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Netherlands 1 2%
Unknown 65 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 11 17%
Student > Master 9 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 8%
Professor 4 6%
Other 13 20%
Unknown 19 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 30 45%
Nursing and Health Professions 8 12%
Social Sciences 2 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 2%
Decision Sciences 1 2%
Other 3 5%
Unknown 21 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 March 2020.
All research outputs
#15,237,301
of 22,655,397 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#129,737
of 193,429 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#95,402
of 139,451 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#1,657
of 2,558 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,655,397 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 193,429 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.0. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 139,451 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2,558 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.