You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Chapter title |
Vacuum Cleaning CTL Formulae
|
|---|---|
| Chapter number | 39 |
| Book title |
Computer Aided Verification
|
| Published in |
Lecture notes in computer science, July 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1007/3-540-45657-0_39 |
| Book ISBNs |
978-3-54-043997-4, 978-3-54-045657-5
|
| Authors |
Mitra Purandare, Fabio Somenzi |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 7 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 14% |
| Germany | 1 | 14% |
| Unknown | 5 | 71% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 29% |
| Researcher | 2 | 29% |
| Student > Master | 2 | 29% |
| Unknown | 1 | 14% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Computer Science | 5 | 71% |
| Engineering | 1 | 14% |
| Unknown | 1 | 14% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 October 2014.
All research outputs
#12,930,522
of 22,817,213 outputs
Outputs from Lecture notes in computer science
#3,776
of 8,124 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#115,938
of 263,414 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Lecture notes in computer science
#72
of 348 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,817,213 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,124 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 5.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 263,414 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 348 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.