| Title |
Volatile compounds from interdigital gland of male white-tailed deer (Odocoileus virginianus)
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Chemical Ecology, September 1996
|
| DOI | 10.1007/bf02272407 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
J. W. Gassett, D. P. Wiesler, A. G. Baker, D. A. Osborn, K. V. Miller, R. L. Marchinton, M. Novotny |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 18 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 18 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 6 | 33% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 2 | 11% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 11% |
| Professor | 1 | 6% |
| Other | 2 | 11% |
| Unknown | 3 | 17% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 9 | 50% |
| Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 2 | 11% |
| Environmental Science | 1 | 6% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 1 | 6% |
| Chemistry | 1 | 6% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 4 | 22% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 September 2006.
All research outputs
#7,569,361
of 23,085,832 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Chemical Ecology
#635
of 2,056 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,655
of 30,229 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Chemical Ecology
#5
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,085,832 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,056 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.1. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 30,229 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 7th percentile – i.e., 7% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.