| Title |
Antitumor activities of several phytopolysaccharides
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Archives of Pharmacal Research, March 1985
|
| DOI | 10.1007/bf02897565 |
| Authors |
Chang Kiu Moon, Kwang Sik Park, Soo Hwan Lee, Yeo Pyo Yoon |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 2 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 1 | 50% |
| Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Professor | 1 | 50% |
| Student > Master | 1 | 50% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 50% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 50% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 September 2006.
All research outputs
#7,569,361
of 23,085,832 outputs
Outputs from Archives of Pharmacal Research
#371
of 1,299 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,701
of 9,721 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Archives of Pharmacal Research
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,085,832 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,299 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.3. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 9,721 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them