You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Does Garbage in the Diet Improve Reproductive Output of Glaucous Gulls?
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Ornithological Applications, August 2010
|
| DOI | 10.1525/cond.2010.100020 |
| Authors |
Emily L. Weiser, Abby N. Powell |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 114 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 4 | 4% |
| Iran, Islamic Republic of | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| India | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 107 | 94% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 24 | 21% |
| Student > Master | 23 | 20% |
| Researcher | 15 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 12 | 11% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 6 | 5% |
| Other | 15 | 13% |
| Unknown | 19 | 17% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 63 | 55% |
| Environmental Science | 16 | 14% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 4 | 4% |
| Unspecified | 2 | 2% |
| Computer Science | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 8 | 7% |
| Unknown | 19 | 17% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 September 2010.
All research outputs
#3,726,631
of 22,817,213 outputs
Outputs from Ornithological Applications
#334
of 1,937 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#15,543
of 94,492 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Ornithological Applications
#1
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,817,213 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,937 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 94,492 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them