↓ Skip to main content

Critical review of theoretical models for anomalous effects in deuterated metals

Overview of attention for article published in International Journal of Theoretical Physics, March 1994
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

patent
2 patents

Citations

dimensions_citation
15 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
10 Mendeley
Title
Critical review of theoretical models for anomalous effects in deuterated metals
Published in
International Journal of Theoretical Physics, March 1994
DOI 10.1007/bf00670521
Authors

V. A. Chechin, V. A. Tsarev, M. Rabinowitz, Y. E. Kim

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 10 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 10 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 5 50%
Professor 1 10%
Student > Master 1 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 10%
Professor > Associate Professor 1 10%
Other 1 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Physics and Astronomy 3 30%
Chemistry 3 30%
Engineering 2 20%
Materials Science 1 10%
Unknown 1 10%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 April 2009.
All research outputs
#7,569,361
of 23,085,832 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Theoretical Physics
#112
of 1,813 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,562
of 22,723 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Theoretical Physics
#3
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,085,832 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,813 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 1.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 22,723 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.