↓ Skip to main content

Understanding network concepts in modules

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Systems Biology, June 2007
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
373 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
554 Mendeley
citeulike
12 CiteULike
connotea
5 Connotea
Title
Understanding network concepts in modules
Published in
BMC Systems Biology, June 2007
DOI 10.1186/1752-0509-1-24
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jun Dong, Steve Horvath

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 554 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 21 4%
United Kingdom 7 1%
Sweden 3 <1%
Brazil 3 <1%
Germany 3 <1%
France 2 <1%
Colombia 2 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Other 8 1%
Unknown 503 91%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 153 28%
Researcher 132 24%
Student > Master 61 11%
Professor > Associate Professor 33 6%
Professor 27 5%
Other 101 18%
Unknown 47 8%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 231 42%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 82 15%
Computer Science 52 9%
Mathematics 21 4%
Medicine and Dentistry 19 3%
Other 86 16%
Unknown 63 11%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 May 2021.
All research outputs
#8,882,501
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from BMC Systems Biology
#330
of 1,135 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#31,173
of 86,071 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Systems Biology
#2
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,135 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 86,071 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 8 of them.