Title |
Understanding network concepts in modules
|
---|---|
Published in |
BMC Systems Biology, June 2007
|
DOI | 10.1186/1752-0509-1-24 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Jun Dong, Steve Horvath |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 554 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 21 | 4% |
United Kingdom | 7 | 1% |
Sweden | 3 | <1% |
Brazil | 3 | <1% |
Germany | 3 | <1% |
France | 2 | <1% |
Colombia | 2 | <1% |
Australia | 1 | <1% |
Italy | 1 | <1% |
Other | 8 | 1% |
Unknown | 503 | 91% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 153 | 28% |
Researcher | 132 | 24% |
Student > Master | 61 | 11% |
Professor > Associate Professor | 33 | 6% |
Professor | 27 | 5% |
Other | 101 | 18% |
Unknown | 47 | 8% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 231 | 42% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 82 | 15% |
Computer Science | 52 | 9% |
Mathematics | 21 | 4% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 19 | 3% |
Other | 86 | 16% |
Unknown | 63 | 11% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 May 2021.
All research outputs
#8,882,501
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from BMC Systems Biology
#330
of 1,135 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#31,173
of 86,071 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Systems Biology
#2
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,135 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 86,071 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 8 of them.